[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180911174158.7qu6f4vfnfzqqrcf@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:41:58 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Random crashes with i386 and efi boots
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:36:51AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > save_pgd = efi_call_phys_prolog();
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > status = efi_call_phys(...);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
> > efi_call_phys_epilog(save_pgd);
> >
> > So, yes, interrupts are very much enabled.
>
> Does fixing that solve the problem? It seems more robust.
The problem is still that in efi_call_phys_prolog() we load the gdt with
its physical address, and when we reload the %cr3 in _epilog from
initial_page_table to swapper_pg_dir again the gdt is no longer mapped.
Blocking interrupts is more robust, but we can't block NMIs that way
that would also trigger the issue, no?
So I am in favor of changing the order in efi_call_phys_epilog() too.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists