[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1536696866.3024.151.camel@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:14:26 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 51/79] bnxt_en: Fix for system hang if request_irq
fails
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 09:53 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit c58387ab1614f6d7fb9e244f214b61e7631421fc ]
>
> Fix bug in the error code path when bnxt_request_irq() returns failure.
> bnxt_disable_napi() should not be called in this error path because
> NAPI has not been enabled yet.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -4591,7 +4591,7 @@ static int __bnxt_open_nic(struct bnxt *
> rc = bnxt_request_irq(bp);
> if (rc) {
> netdev_err(bp->dev, "bnxt_request_irq err: %x\n", rc);
> - goto open_err;
> + goto open_err_irq;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -4629,6 +4629,8 @@ static int __bnxt_open_nic(struct bnxt *
>
> open_err:
> bnxt_disable_napi(bp);
> +
> +open_err_irq:
> bnxt_del_napi(bp);
Shouldn't this added statement be conditional on irq_re_init?
Ben.
>
> open_err_free_mem:
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd
https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street
Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists