[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATSNQBbxQHkbo2zG1G44=urpC_cutu_D126QfDpMg5TNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:31:15 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: "open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM"
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dmaengine: uniphier-mdmac: add UniPhier MIO DMAC driver
2018-09-12 16:26 GMT+09:00 Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>:
> On 12-09-18, 14:25, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2018-09-12 13:35 GMT+09:00 Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>:
>> > On 12-09-18, 12:01, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> >> Hi Vinod,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2018-09-11 16:00 GMT+09:00 Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>:
>> >> > On 24-08-18, 10:41, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> +/* mc->vc.lock must be held by caller */
>> >> >> +static u32 __uniphier_mdmac_get_residue(struct uniphier_mdmac_desc *md)
>> >> >> +{
>> >> >> + u32 residue = 0;
>> >> >> + int i;
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> + for (i = md->sg_cur; i < md->sg_len; i++)
>> >> >> + residue += sg_dma_len(&md->sgl[i]);
>> >> >
>> >> > so if the descriptor is submitted to hardware, we return the descriptor
>> >> > length, which is not correct.
>> >> >
>> >> > Two cases are required to be handled:
>> >> > 1. Descriptor is in queue (IMO above logic is fine for that, but it can
>> >> > be calculated at descriptor submit and looked up here)
>> >>
>> >> Where do you want it to be calculated?
>> >
>> > where is it calculated now?
>>
>>
>> Please see __uniphier_mdmac_handle().
>>
>>
>> It gets the address and size by sg_dma_address(), sg_dma_len()
>> just before setting them to the hardware registers.
>>
>>
>> sg = &md->sgl[md->sg_cur];
>>
>> if (md->dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
>> src_mode = UNIPHIER_MDMAC_CH_MODE__ADDR_INC;
>> src_addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
>> dest_mode = UNIPHIER_MDMAC_CH_MODE__ADDR_FIXED;
>> dest_addr = 0;
>> } else {
>> src_mode = UNIPHIER_MDMAC_CH_MODE__ADDR_FIXED;
>> src_addr = 0;
>> dest_mode = UNIPHIER_MDMAC_CH_MODE__ADDR_INC;
>> dest_addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> This hardware provides only simple registers (address and size)
>> >> for one-shot transfer instead of descriptors.
>> >>
>> >> So, I used sgl as-is because I did not see a good reason
>> >> to transform sgl to another data structure.
>> >
>> >
>> >> > this seems missing stuff. Where do you do register calculation for the
>> >> > descriptor and where is slave_config here, how do you know where to
>> >> > send/receive data form/to (peripheral)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This dmac is really simple, and un-flexible.
>> >>
>> >> The peripheral address to send/receive data from/to is hard-weird.
>> >> cfg->{src_addr,dst_addr} is not configurable.
>> >>
>> >> Look at __uniphier_mdmac_handle().
>> >> 'dest_addr' and 'src_addr' must be set to 0 for the peripheral.
>> >
>> > Fair enough, what about other values like addr_width and maxburst?
>>
>>
>> None of them is configurable.
>
> what is configurable here :-)
The physical address of the memory, transfer size, direction
are configurable, of course.
But, they are out of scope of device_config hook.
> Who are the users of this DMA?
SD/eMMC controllers.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists