[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWefU0pw=c9TKOa+wGHchpg8JRfE0OnC4+wKDt-qrbH1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:43:53 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] Driver for at91 usart in spi mode
Hi Lee,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:41 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 11/09/2018 23:54:40+0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/Atmel-6438-32-bit-ARM926-Embedded-Microprocessor-SAM9G45_Datasheet.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > USART doc starting p572, registers p621.
> > >
> > > After looking at the datasheet, I don't see any reason why one of the
> > > two drivers can't be selected using different compatible strings.
> >
> > Because there is only one IP and we don't use the device tree to selecet
> > linux specific drivers.
>
> We do it all the time. There are loads of MFDs (def: same IP, with
> different functions) which have separate compatibles for their various
> functions. If you wish this IP to operate as an SPI controller, it
> should have an SPI compatible, if you wish it to operate as a U(S)ART,
> then it should have a UART compatible. It's what we do for most of
> the other MFDs in the kernel.
There is a big difference: MFD functions are(more or less) independent
functions, which can be used at the same time. It makes perfect sense for a
single IP block that has both SPI and UART interfaces, that can be used at
the same time.
In this case, there is a single piece of hardware that can perform
different functions, but not at the same time. Performing a different
function means configuring the hardware for that function, hence using a
different driver (from a different subsystem).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists