[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <641119b9-3466-817d-3d6b-dd710c646b49@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:32:21 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
christoffer.dall@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/27] arm64: Use daifflag_restore after bp_hardening
Hi Julien,
On 28/08/18 16:51, Julien Thierry wrote:
> For EL0 entries requiring bp_hardening, daif status is kept at
> DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ until after hardening has been done. Then interrupts
> are enabled through local_irq_enable().
>
> Before using local_irq_* functions, daifflags should be properly restored
> to a state where IRQs are enabled.
> Enable IRQs by restoring DAIF_PROCCTX state after bp hardening.
Is this just for symmetry, or are you going on to add something to the daifflags
state that local_irq_* functions won't change? (if so, could you allude to that
in the commit message)
Either way,
Acked-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists