| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 01:10:03 +0000
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To: Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@...inx.com>
Cc: matthias.bgg@...il.com, andy.gross@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
geert+renesas@...der.be, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
michal.simek@...inx.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
rajanv@...inx.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>,
Jolly Shah <jollys@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drivers: soc: xilinx: Add ZynqMP PM driver
Hi!
[ Thanks a lot for upstreaming this.. ]
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:34:57PM -0700, Jolly Shah wrote:
> From: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>
>
> Add ZynqMP PM driver. PM driver provides power management
> support for ZynqMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jollys@...inx.com>
> ---
[...]
> +static irqreturn_t zynqmp_pm_isr(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + u32 payload[CB_PAYLOAD_SIZE];
> +
> + zynqmp_pm_get_callback_data(payload);
> +
> + /* First element is callback API ID, others are callback arguments */
> + if (payload[0] == PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB) {
> + if (work_pending(&zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work))
> + goto done;
> +
> + /* Copy callback arguments into work's structure */
> + memcpy(zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->args, &payload[1],
> + sizeof(zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->args));
> +
> + queue_work(system_unbound_wq,
> + &zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work);
We already have devm_request_threaded_irq() which can does this
automatically for us.
Use that method to register the ISR instead, then if there's more
work to do, just do the memcpy and return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD.
> + }
> +
> +done:
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn() - Initialize suspend
> + * @work: Pointer to work_struct
> + *
> + * Bottom-half of PM callback IRQ handler.
> + */
> +static void zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct *pm_work =
> + container_of(work, struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct, callback_work);
> +
> + if (pm_work->args[0] == ZYNQMP_PM_SUSPEND_REASON_SYSTEM_SHUTDOWN) {
we_really_seem_to_love_long_40_col_names_for_some_reason
> + orderly_poweroff(true);
> + } else if (pm_work->args[0] ==
> + ZYNQMP_PM_SUSPEND_REASON_POWER_UNIT_REQUEST) {
Ditto
[...]
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_sysfs_init() - Initialize PM driver sysfs interface
> + * @dev: Pointer to device structure
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_pm_sysfs_init(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_suspend_mode.attr);
> +}
> +
Sysfs file is created in platform driver's probe(), but is not
removed anywhere in the code.
What happens if this is built as a module? Am I missing something
obvious?
Moreover, what's the wisdom of creating a one-liner function with
a huge six-line comment that:
a) _purely_ wraps sysfs_create_file(); no extra logic
b) is called only once
c) and not passed as a function pointer anywhere
IMO Such one-liner translators obfuscate the code and review
process with no apparent gain..
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_probe() - Probe existence of the PMU Firmware
> + * and initialize debugfs interface
> + *
> + * @pdev: Pointer to the platform_device structure
> + *
> + * Return: Returns 0 on success, negative error code otherwise
> + */
Again, huge 8-line comment that provide no value.
If anyone wants to know what a platform driver probe() does, he
or she better check the primary references at:
- Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt
- include/linux/platform_device.h
and not the comment above..
> +static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret, irq;
> + u32 pm_api_version;
> +
> + const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops = zynqmp_pm_get_eemi_ops();
> +
> + if (!eemi_ops || !eemi_ops->get_api_version || !eemi_ops->init_finalize)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + eemi_ops->init_finalize();
> + eemi_ops->get_api_version(&pm_api_version);
> +
> + /* Check PM API version number */
> + if (pm_api_version < ZYNQMP_PM_VERSION)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq <= 0)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, zynqmp_pm_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), pdev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_irq '%d' failed with %d\n",
> + irq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
> + devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work,
> + zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn);
> +
Let's use devm_request_threaded_irq(). Then we can completely
remove the work_struct, INIT_WORK(), and queuue_work() bits.
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_sysfs_init(&pdev->dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to initialize sysfs interface\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
Just return 0 please. BTW ret was declared without initialization.
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id pm_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-power", },
> + { /* end of table */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_pm_platform_driver = {
> + .probe = zynqmp_pm_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zynqmp_power",
> + .of_match_table = pm_of_match,
> + },
> +};
.remove with a basic sysfs_remove_file() is needed.
Thanks,
--
Darwi
http://darwish.chasingpointers.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists