| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:13:31 +0200
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"open list:KERNEL BUILD + fi..." <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mark Brand <markbrand@...gle.com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
Vishwath Mohan <vishwath@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/18] khwasan, arm64: add brk handler for inline instrumentation
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
> KHWASAN inline instrumentation mode (which embeds checks of shadow memory
> into the generated code, instead of inserting a callback) generates a brk
> instruction when a tag mismatch is detected.
>
> This commit add a KHWASAN brk handler, that decodes the immediate value
> passed to the brk instructions (to extract information about the memory
> access that triggered the mismatch), reads the register values (x0 contains
> the guilty address) and reports the bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/brk-imm.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/brk-imm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/brk-imm.h
> index ed693c5bcec0..e4a7013321dc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/brk-imm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/brk-imm.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@
> * 0x400: for dynamic BRK instruction
> * 0x401: for compile time BRK instruction
> * 0x800: kernel-mode BUG() and WARN() traps
> + * 0x9xx: KHWASAN trap (allowed values 0x900 - 0x9ff)
> */
> #define FAULT_BRK_IMM 0x100
> #define KGDB_DYN_DBG_BRK_IMM 0x400
> #define KGDB_COMPILED_DBG_BRK_IMM 0x401
> #define BUG_BRK_IMM 0x800
> +#define KHWASAN_BRK_IMM 0x900
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 039e9ff379cc..fd70347d1ce7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> +#include <linux/kasan.h>
>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> #include <asm/bug.h>
> @@ -269,10 +270,14 @@ void arm64_notify_die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs,
> }
> }
>
> -void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
> +void __arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
> {
> regs->pc += size;
> +}
>
> +void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
> +{
> + __arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, size);
> /*
> * If we were single stepping, we want to get the step exception after
> * we return from the trap.
> @@ -775,7 +780,7 @@ static int bug_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> }
>
> /* If thread survives, skip over the BUG instruction and continue: */
> - arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE);
> + __arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE);
> return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> }
>
> @@ -785,6 +790,59 @@ static struct break_hook bug_break_hook = {
> .fn = bug_handler,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW
> +
> +#define KHWASAN_ESR_RECOVER 0x20
> +#define KHWASAN_ESR_WRITE 0x10
> +#define KHWASAN_ESR_SIZE_MASK 0x0f
> +#define KHWASAN_ESR_SIZE(esr) (1 << ((esr) & KHWASAN_ESR_SIZE_MASK))
> +
> +static int khwasan_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> +{
> + bool recover = esr & KHWASAN_ESR_RECOVER;
> + bool write = esr & KHWASAN_ESR_WRITE;
> + size_t size = KHWASAN_ESR_SIZE(esr);
> + u64 addr = regs->regs[0];
> + u64 pc = regs->pc;
> +
> + if (user_mode(regs))
> + return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
> +
> + kasan_report(addr, size, write, pc);
> +
> + /*
> + * The instrumentation allows to control whether we can proceed after
> + * a crash was detected. This is done by passing the -recover flag to
> + * the compiler. Disabling recovery allows to generate more compact
> + * code.
> + *
> + * Unfortunately disabling recovery doesn't work for the kernel right
> + * now. KHWASAN reporting is disabled in some contexts (for example when
> + * the allocator accesses slab object metadata; same is true for KASAN;
> + * this is controlled by current->kasan_depth). All these accesses are
> + * detected by the tool, even though the reports for them are not
> + * printed.
I am not following this part.
Slab accesses metadata. OK.
This is detected as bad access. OK.
Report is not printed. OK.
We skip BRK and resume execution.
What is the problem?
> + *
> + * This is something that might be fixed at some point in the future.
> + */
> + if (!recover)
> + die("Oops - KHWASAN", regs, 0);
> +
> + /* If thread survives, skip over the brk instruction and continue: */
> + __arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE);
> + return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +#define KHWASAN_ESR_VAL (0xf2000000 | KHWASAN_BRK_IMM)
> +#define KHWASAN_ESR_MASK 0xffffff00
> +
> +static struct break_hook khwasan_break_hook = {
> + .esr_val = KHWASAN_ESR_VAL,
> + .esr_mask = KHWASAN_ESR_MASK,
> + .fn = khwasan_handler,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Initial handler for AArch64 BRK exceptions
> * This handler only used until debug_traps_init().
> @@ -792,6 +850,10 @@ static struct break_hook bug_break_hook = {
> int __init early_brk64(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW
> + if ((esr & KHWASAN_ESR_MASK) == KHWASAN_ESR_VAL)
> + return khwasan_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> +#endif
> return bug_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> }
>
> @@ -799,4 +861,7 @@ int __init early_brk64(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> void __init trap_init(void)
> {
> register_break_hook(&bug_break_hook);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW
> + register_break_hook(&khwasan_break_hook);
> +#endif
> }
> --
> 2.19.0.rc0.228.g281dcd1b4d0-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists