[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f95c28d6-70f2-3f18-4ab9-c756c7581126@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:16:16 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread spectre
v2 STIBP mitigation
On 09/11/2018 04:16 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
>> On 09/10/2018 04:46 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>>> Nah, IBPB is actuall there, sorry. So I'll add reporting of STIBP + fixup
>>> the missing reporting of RSB_CTXSW for v6.
>>>
>>
>> I anticipate that STIBP could affect workloads with a lot of indirect
>> branches (see previous discussion with Andrea). We should have a
>> knob for people to opt in or opt out of STIBP.
>
> Feel free to send a patch to that effect.
Tim, are you planning on sending a patch for this? If so, what type of
opt in/out are you thinking about, something similar to SSBD?
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists