linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: Defer ZONE_DEVICE page initialization to the point where we init pgmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:11:51 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: Defer ZONE_DEVICE page initialization to the
 point where we init pgmap

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Pasha Tatashin
<Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/12/18 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:59 AM Pasha Tatashin
>>> <Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>>> Please re-base on linux-next,  memmap_init_zone() has been updated there
>>>> compared to mainline. You might even find a way to unify some parts of
>>>> memmap_init_zone and memmap_init_zone_device as memmap_init_zone() is a
>>>> lot simpler now.
>>>
>>> This patch applied to the linux-next tree with only a little bit of
>>> fuzz. It looks like it is mostly due to some code you had added above
>>> the function as well. I have updated this patch so that it will apply
>>> to both linux and linux-next by just moving the new function to
>>> underneath memmap_init_zone instead of above it.
>>>
>>>> I think __init_single_page() should stay local to page_alloc.c to keep
>>>> the inlining optimization.
>>>
>>> I agree. In addition it will make pulling common init together into
>>> one space easier. I would rather not have us create an opportunity for
>>> things to further diverge by making it available for anybody to use.
>>
>> I'll buy the inline argument for keeping the new routine in
>> page_alloc.c, but I otherwise do not see the divergence danger or
>> "making __init_single_page() available for anybody" given the the
>> declaration is limited in scope to a mm/ local header file.
>>
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> It is much harder for compiler to decide that function can be inlined
> once it is non-static. Of course, we can simply move this function to a
> header file, and declare it inline to begin with.
>
> But, still __init_single_page() is so performance sensitive, that I'd
> like to reduce number of callers to this function, and keep it in .c file.

Yes, agree, inline considerations win the day. I was just objecting to
the "make it available for anybody" assertion.