[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559a0a91-d8d1-453c-6071-1a6ce891c66f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:47:59 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: will.deacon@....com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...il.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] x86/mm: Page size aware flush_tlb_mm_range()
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>> @@ -507,23 +507,25 @@ struct flush_tlb_info {
>>> unsigned long start;
>>> unsigned long end;
>>> u64 new_tlb_gen;
>>> + unsigned int invl_shift;
>>> };
>>
>> Maybe we really should just call this flush_stride or something.
>
> But its a shift, not a size. stride_shift?
Yeah, sounds better than 'invl' to me.
>>> #define local_flush_tlb() __flush_tlb()
>>>
>>> #define flush_tlb_mm(mm) flush_tlb_mm_range(mm, 0UL, TLB_FLUSH_ALL, 0UL)
>>>
>>> -#define flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end) \
>>> - flush_tlb_mm_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end, vma->vm_flags)
>>> +#define flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end) \
>>> + flush_tlb_mm_range((vma)->vm_mm, start, end, \
>>> + (vma)->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB ? PMD_SHIFT : PAGE_SHIFT)
>>
>> This is safe. But, Couldn't this PMD_SHIFT also be PUD_SHIFT for a 1G
>> hugetlb page?
>
> It could be, but can we tell at that point?
We should have the page size via huge_page_shift(hstate_vma(vma)). No
idea if it'll work in practice, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists