linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: meson: Switch simple-mfd and syscon order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:20:53 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     linux-amlogic <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: meson: Switch simple-mfd and syscon order

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:59 PM Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> writes:
>
> > The order between "syscon" and "simple-mfd" is important because in these
> > particular cases, the node needs to be first a "simple-mfd" to expose
> > it's sub-nodes, and later on a "syscon" to permit other nodes to access
> > this register space through the "syscon" mechanism.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>
> Applied to v4.20/dt64,
>

I spoke too soon, this doesn't apply cleanly on top of Jeromes
reorder/cleanup.  Please respin/resend.

Kevin