[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b97d7ccc921572ca5d783584eea1de04341ab02f.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:21:37 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Cedric Roux <sed@...e.fr>, kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: s3c24xx: formatting cleanup in
mach-mini2440.c
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 23:54 +0200, Cedric Roux wrote:
> Running:
> scripts/checkpatch.pl -f arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c
> revealed several errors and warnings.
>
> They were all removed, except one which is an #if 0 around the declaration
> of a gpio pin. This needs some more investigation and I prefer to let it
> here. This is not some dead code.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c
[]
> @@ -674,17 +680,17 @@ static void __init mini2440_init(void)
> mini2440_fb_info.displays =
> &mini2440_lcd_cfg[features.lcd_index];
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO "MINI2440: LCD");
> + pr_info("MINI2440: LCD");
OK
> for (li = 0; li < ARRAY_SIZE(mini2440_lcd_cfg); li++)
> if (li == features.lcd_index)
> - printk(" [%d:%dx%d]", li,
> + pr_info(" [%d:%dx%d]", li,
> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].width,
> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].height);
pr_cont
> else
> - printk(" %d:%dx%d", li,
> + pr_info(" %d:%dx%d", li,
pr_cont
> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].width,
> mini2440_lcd_cfg[li].height);
> - printk("\n");
> + pr_info("\n");
pr_cont
So only the first printk should use pr_info().
The subsequent printk uses should use pr_cont()
> s3c24xx_fb_set_platdata(&mini2440_fb_info);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists