linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 13/78] act_ife: move tcfa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180913131806.627503894@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:31:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 13/78] act_ife: move tcfa_lock down to where necessary

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 4e407ff5cd67ec76eeeea1deec227b7982dc7f66 ]

The only time we need to take tcfa_lock is when adding
a new metainfo to an existing ife->metalist. We don't need
to take tcfa_lock so early and so broadly in tcf_ife_init().

This means we can always take ife_mod_lock first, avoid the
reverse locking ordering warning as reported by Vlad.

Reported-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Tested-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sched/act_ife.c |   37 +++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--- a/net/sched/act_ife.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ife.c
@@ -267,10 +267,8 @@ static int ife_validate_metatype(struct
 }
 
 /* called when adding new meta information
- * under ife->tcf_lock for existing action
 */
-static int load_metaops_and_vet(struct tcf_ife_info *ife, u32 metaid,
-				void *val, int len, bool exists)
+static int load_metaops_and_vet(u32 metaid, void *val, int len)
 {
 	struct tcf_meta_ops *ops = find_ife_oplist(metaid);
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -278,13 +276,9 @@ static int load_metaops_and_vet(struct t
 	if (!ops) {
 		ret = -ENOENT;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
-		if (exists)
-			spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 		rtnl_unlock();
 		request_module("ifemeta%u", metaid);
 		rtnl_lock();
-		if (exists)
-			spin_lock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 		ops = find_ife_oplist(metaid);
 #endif
 	}
@@ -301,10 +295,9 @@ static int load_metaops_and_vet(struct t
 }
 
 /* called when adding new meta information
- * under ife->tcf_lock for existing action
 */
 static int add_metainfo(struct tcf_ife_info *ife, u32 metaid, void *metaval,
-			int len, bool atomic)
+			int len, bool atomic, bool exists)
 {
 	struct tcf_meta_info *mi = NULL;
 	struct tcf_meta_ops *ops = find_ife_oplist(metaid);
@@ -331,12 +324,16 @@ static int add_metainfo(struct tcf_ife_i
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (exists)
+		spin_lock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&mi->metalist, &ife->metalist);
+	if (exists)
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int use_all_metadata(struct tcf_ife_info *ife)
+static int use_all_metadata(struct tcf_ife_info *ife, bool exists)
 {
 	struct tcf_meta_ops *o;
 	int rc = 0;
@@ -344,7 +341,7 @@ static int use_all_metadata(struct tcf_i
 
 	read_lock(&ife_mod_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(o, &ifeoplist, list) {
-		rc = add_metainfo(ife, o->metaid, NULL, 0, true);
+		rc = add_metainfo(ife, o->metaid, NULL, 0, true, exists);
 		if (rc == 0)
 			installed += 1;
 	}
@@ -416,7 +413,6 @@ static void tcf_ife_cleanup(struct tc_ac
 	spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 }
 
-/* under ife->tcf_lock for existing action */
 static int populate_metalist(struct tcf_ife_info *ife, struct nlattr **tb,
 			     bool exists)
 {
@@ -430,11 +426,11 @@ static int populate_metalist(struct tcf_
 			val = nla_data(tb[i]);
 			len = nla_len(tb[i]);
 
-			rc = load_metaops_and_vet(ife, i, val, len, exists);
+			rc = load_metaops_and_vet(i, val, len);
 			if (rc != 0)
 				return rc;
 
-			rc = add_metainfo(ife, i, val, len, exists);
+			rc = add_metainfo(ife, i, val, len, false, exists);
 			if (rc)
 				return rc;
 		}
@@ -510,6 +506,8 @@ static int tcf_ife_init(struct net *net,
 	if (exists)
 		spin_lock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 	ife->tcf_action = parm->action;
+	if (exists)
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 
 	if (parm->flags & IFE_ENCODE) {
 		if (daddr)
@@ -537,9 +535,6 @@ metadata_parse_err:
 				tcf_hash_release(*a, bind);
 			if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
 				_tcf_ife_cleanup(*a, bind);
-
-			if (exists)
-				spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 			return err;
 		}
 
@@ -553,20 +548,14 @@ metadata_parse_err:
 		 * as we can. You better have at least one else we are
 		 * going to bail out
 		 */
-		err = use_all_metadata(ife);
+		err = use_all_metadata(ife, exists);
 		if (err) {
 			if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
 				_tcf_ife_cleanup(*a, bind);
-
-			if (exists)
-				spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
 			return err;
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (exists)
-		spin_unlock_bh(&ife->tcf_lock);
-
 	if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
 		tcf_hash_insert(tn, *a);