linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 102/115] x86/pae: use 64 bit atomic xchg function in native_ptep_get_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180913131829.659361485@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:32:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
        Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@...il.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 102/115] x86/pae: use 64 bit atomic xchg function in native_ptep_get_and_clear

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>

commit b2d7a075a1ccef2fb321d595802190c8e9b39004 upstream.

Using only 32-bit writes for the pte will result in an intermediate
L1TF vulnerable PTE. When running as a Xen PV guest this will at once
switch the guest to shadow mode resulting in a loss of performance.

Use arch_atomic64_xchg() instead which will perform the requested
operation atomically with all 64 bits.

Some performance considerations according to:

https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/ad/dc/Intel-Xeon-Scalable-Processor-throughput-latency.pdf

The main number should be the latency, as there is no tight loop around
native_ptep_get_and_clear().

"lock cmpxchg8b" has a latency of 20 cycles, while "lock xchg" (with a
memory operand) isn't mentioned in that document. "lock xadd" (with xadd
having 3 cycles less latency than xchg) has a latency of 11, so we can
assume a latency of 14 for "lock xchg".

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Tested-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_X86_PGTABLE_3LEVEL_H
 #define _ASM_X86_PGTABLE_3LEVEL_H
 
+#include <asm/atomic64_32.h>
+
 /*
  * Intel Physical Address Extension (PAE) Mode - three-level page
  * tables on PPro+ CPUs.
@@ -147,10 +149,7 @@ static inline pte_t native_ptep_get_and_
 {
 	pte_t res;
 
-	/* xchg acts as a barrier before the setting of the high bits */
-	res.pte_low = xchg(&ptep->pte_low, 0);
-	res.pte_high = ptep->pte_high;
-	ptep->pte_high = 0;
+	res.pte = (pteval_t)arch_atomic64_xchg((atomic64_t *)ptep, 0);
 
 	return res;
 }