[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gmwvVa_YT8JQvDsW58xmubtKT58bH77zz8c5FdA8Py8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:27:20 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kernel/hung_task.c: disable on suspend
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:23 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:11 PM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is possible to observe hung_task complaints when system goes to
> > > suspend-to-idle state:
> > >
> > > PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > > Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> > > OOM killer disabled.
> > > Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
> > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > > INFO: task bash:1569 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > > Not tainted 4.19.0-rc3_+ #687
> > > "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > bash D 0 1569 604 0x00000000
> > > Call Trace:
> > > ? __schedule+0x1fe/0x7e0
> > > schedule+0x28/0x80
> > > suspend_devices_and_enter+0x4ac/0x750
> > > pm_suspend+0x2c0/0x310
> >
> > This actually is a good catch, but the problem is related to what
> > happens to the monotonic clock during suspend to idle.
> >
> > The clock issue needs to be addressed anyway IMO and then this problem
> > will go away automatically.
>
> I don't understand your discussion with Vitaly, but shouldn't we make
> khungtaskd thread freezable anyway?
Well, if the Vitaly's patch is applied, that shouldn't be necessary
and I wouldn't like to add more freezable kernel threads if that's
avoidable TBH.
Cheers,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists