linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/bridge: add bus flag support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZdxLMkECq8BBJHDqKszHPMt2uUPFbwbPVNKXyxu-SWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:07:03 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        sean@...rly.run, Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
        max.krummenacher@...adex.com,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/bridge: add bus flag support

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:32 PM Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:

> @Linus Walleij, Laurent Pinchart: Since you have been involved in
> the initial bus timings discussion, I would like to have your Ack
> on at least patch 2/3... If we want to keep the setup/hold timings,
> the patchset should also work without those two patches.

AFAICT this ends up with the PL111 code identical to what I
proposed in my first patch set to support the latching properly,
so I am pretty much happy as long as my hardware does not
flicker. (Rough consensus and running code.) I'm not very invested
in either idea to represent these timings, so
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij