[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d6457cf-a105-3d88-bd38-d46b24f70501@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:12:13 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, paul.durrant@...rix.com,
wei.liu2@...rix.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, roger.pau@...rix.com,
srinivas.eeda@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] xenbus: process be_watch events in xenwatch
multithreading
On 14/09/18 09:34, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This is the 5th patch of a (6-patch) patch set.
>
> With this patch, watch event in relative path pattern
> 'backend/<pvdev>/<domid>i/...' can be processed in per-domU xenwatch
superfluous "i" ----------^
> thread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 2 +-
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/xen/xenbus.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> index ba0644c..aa1b15a 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int xenbus_probe_devices(struct xen_bus_type *bus)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_probe_devices);
>
> -static unsigned int char_count(const char *str, char c)
> +unsigned int char_count(const char *str, char c)
Please change the name of the function when making it globally
visible, e.g. by prefixing "xenbus_".
Generally I think you don't need to use it below.
> {
> unsigned int i, ret = 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
> index b0bed4f..50df86a 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
> @@ -211,9 +211,41 @@ static void backend_changed(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
> xenbus_dev_changed(path, &xenbus_backend);
> }
>
> +static domid_t path_to_domid(const char *path)
> +{
> + const char *p = path;
> + domid_t domid = 0;
> +
> + while (*p) {
> + if (*p < '0' || *p > '9')
> + break;
> + domid = (domid << 3) + (domid << 1) + (*p - '0');
reinventing atoi()?
Please don't do that. kstrtou16() seems to be a perfect fit.
> + p++;
> + }
> +
> + return domid;
> +}
> +
> +/* path: backend/<pvdev>/<domid>/... */
> +static domid_t be_get_domid(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
> + const char *path,
> + const char *token)
> +{
> + const char *p = path;
> +
> + if (char_count(path, '/') < 2)
> + return 0;
> +
> + p = strchr(p, '/') + 1;
> + p = strchr(p, '/') + 1;
Drop the call of char_count() above and test p for being non-NULL
after each call of strchr?
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists