| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:40:44 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>,
Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] thermal: add thermal_zone_device_toggle() helper
On 09/10/2018 07:16 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> Add thermal_zone_device_toggle() helper. Then update core code and
>> drivers to use it.
>
> Cool, but I think it would be good to have some sort of rational here
> at the commit message telling why this helper is being added,
> don't you agree?
Ok, I will enhance the patch description (the rationale is removing
code duplication and preparation for changes in the later patches from
the series).
>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c | 14 ++------------
>> drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 22 +++++-----------------
>> drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 8 +++++---
>> include/linux/thermal.h | 1 +
>> 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
>> index 761d055..9428499 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
>> @@ -515,15 +515,6 @@ static int hisi_thermal_register_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_hisi_thermal_match);
>>
>> -static void hisi_thermal_toggle_sensor(struct hisi_thermal_sensor *sensor,
>> - bool on)
>> -{
>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tzd = sensor->tzd;
>> -
>> - tzd->ops->set_mode(tzd,
>> - on ? THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED : THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct hisi_thermal_data *data;
>> @@ -571,7 +562,7 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - hisi_thermal_toggle_sensor(&data->sensor, true);
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle((&data->sensor)->tzd, true);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -579,9 +570,8 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> static int hisi_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct hisi_thermal_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> - struct hisi_thermal_sensor *sensor = &data->sensor;
>>
>> - hisi_thermal_toggle_sensor(sensor, false);
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle((&data->sensor)->tzd, false);
>>
>> data->disable_sensor(data);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
>> index e09f035..f138b78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device *
>> tzd = thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, sensor_np,
>> data, ops);
>> if (!IS_ERR(tzd))
>> - tzd->ops->set_mode(tzd, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle(tzd, true);
>>
>> of_node_put(sensor_specs.np);
>> of_node_put(child);
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index f36375d..c191e41 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -1022,15 +1022,6 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_mode(int chn, void __iomem *regs,
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_rockchip_thermal_match);
>>
>> -static void
>> -rockchip_thermal_toggle_sensor(struct rockchip_thermal_sensor *sensor, bool on)
>> -{
>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tzd = sensor->tzd;
>> -
>> - tzd->ops->set_mode(tzd,
>> - on ? THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED : THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED);
>> -}
>> -
>> static irqreturn_t rockchip_thermal_alarm_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
>> {
>> struct rockchip_thermal_data *thermal = dev;
>> @@ -1292,7 +1283,7 @@ static int rockchip_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, true);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < thermal->chip->chn_num; i++)
>> - rockchip_thermal_toggle_sensor(&thermal->sensors[i], true);
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle((&thermal->sensors[i])->tzd, true);
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, thermal);
>>
>> @@ -1311,11 +1302,8 @@ static int rockchip_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct rockchip_thermal_data *thermal = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < thermal->chip->chn_num; i++) {
>> - struct rockchip_thermal_sensor *sensor = &thermal->sensors[i];
>> -
>> - rockchip_thermal_toggle_sensor(sensor, false);
>> - }
>> + for (i = 0; i < thermal->chip->chn_num; i++)
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle((&thermal->sensors[i])->tzd, false);
>>
>> thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, false);
>>
>> @@ -1332,7 +1320,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < thermal->chip->chn_num; i++)
>> - rockchip_thermal_toggle_sensor(&thermal->sensors[i], false);
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle((&thermal->sensors[i])->tzd, false);
>>
>> thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, false);
>>
>> @@ -1383,7 +1371,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>> thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, true);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < thermal->chip->chn_num; i++)
>> - rockchip_thermal_toggle_sensor(&thermal->sensors[i], true);
>> + thermal_zone_device_toggle((&thermal->sensors[i])->tzd, true);
>>
>> pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
>> index eb03d7e..d5db101 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
>> @@ -227,3 +227,18 @@ int thermal_zone_get_offset(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_get_offset);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * thermal_zone_device_toggle() - enables/disables thermal zone device
>> + * @tz: a valid pointer to a struct thermal_zone_device
>> + *
>> + * Enables/Disables thermal zone device.
>> + *
>> + * Return: On success returns 0, an error code otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int thermal_zone_device_toggle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, bool on)
>> +{
>> + return tz->ops->set_mode(tz,
>> + on ? THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED : THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED);
>
> why not simply getting a mode type (enum thermal_device_mode)?
Well, none of open-coded instances that thermal_zone_device_toggle()
replaces used enum thermal_device_mode. Using bool is simpler and
this enum looks a bit like over-engineering, though I can use it if
you insist.
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_device_toggle);
>
> I know naming is always the hardest part :-), but to me, this function
> is more a thermal_zone_set_mode() than device_toggle(). At least, based
> on what I see in the code, we are not really toggling device per si,
> just setting a mode.
Ok, I will change it (the naming was based on existing helpers from
hisi_thermal.c and rockchip_thermal.c).
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
>> index 23b5e0a..343f52b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
>> @@ -72,17 +72,19 @@
>> {
>> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
>> int result;
>> + bool on;
>>
>> if (!tz->ops->set_mode)
>> return -EPERM;
>>
>> if (!strncmp(buf, "enabled", sizeof("enabled") - 1))
>> - result = tz->ops->set_mode(tz, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
>> + on = true;
>> else if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", sizeof("disabled") - 1))
>> - result = tz->ops->set_mode(tz, THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED);
>> + on = false;
>> else
>> - result = -EINVAL;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + result = thermal_zone_device_toggle(tz, on);
>> if (result)
>> return result;
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> index 7834be6..4fbbabe 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ struct thermal_cooling_device *
>> int thermal_zone_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp);
>> int thermal_zone_get_slope(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
>> int thermal_zone_get_offset(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
>> +int thermal_zone_device_toggle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, bool on);
>>
>
> You missed the #else section of the #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THERMAL),
> didn't you?
No, this function shouldn't be used outside of CONFIG_THERMAL.
> We want to have a stub when config thermal is not set.
Actually it seems that a lot of these existing stubs don't make sense
outside of CONFIG_THERMAL and should be cleaned up.
>> int get_tz_trend(struct thermal_zone_device *, int);
>> struct thermal_instance *get_thermal_instance(struct thermal_zone_device *,
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists