[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809141459530.10480@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:05:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matt Rickard <matt@...trans.com.au>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI
support
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/14/2018 02:50 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
> > implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
> > another slightly different copy of the same code.
> >
> > Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler tends to
> > generate a jump table which then requires to use retpolines.
>
> Does vDSO code really have to use retpolines? It's in userspace, after all.
Unless you have IBRS/STIPB enabled, you need user space ratpoutine as well.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists