[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180914132930.fphdm3dm2incetbq@qschulz>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:29:30 +0200
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
antoine.tenart@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: mscc: add support for VSC8584 PHY
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Most of the init sequence of a PHY of the package is common to all PHYs
> > in the package, thus we use the SMI broadcast feature which enables us
> > to propagate a write in one register of one PHY to all PHYs in the
> > package.
>
> Hi Quinten
>
> Could you say a bit more about the broadcast. Does the SMI broadcast
> go to all PHY everywhere on an MDIO bus, or only all PHYs within one
> package? I'm just thinking about the case you need two of these
> packages to cover 8 switch ports.
>
Ah sorry, that wasn't very explicit. That's a feature on the PHY side so
my wildest guess is that it wouldn't impact any other PHY outside of
this package. Affecting any other PHY on the bus is counter-intuitive to
me but I'll ask the HW engineers for confirmation.
Thanks,
Quentin
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists