[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfc04379-125b-dd4e-b903-4b9323a25506@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:11:19 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 11/11] vhost_net: batch submitting XDP buffers
to underlayer sockets
On 2018年09月14日 02:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:17:09AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> +static void vhost_tx_batch(struct vhost_net *net,
>> + struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
>> + struct socket *sock,
>> + struct msghdr *msghdr)
>> +{
>> + struct tun_msg_ctl ctl = {
>> + .type = TUN_MSG_PTR,
>> + .num = nvq->batched_xdp,
>> + .ptr = nvq->xdp,
>> + };
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (nvq->batched_xdp == 0)
>> + goto signal_used;
>> +
>> + msghdr->msg_control = &ctl;
>> + err = sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, msghdr, 0);
>> + if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
>> + vq_err(&nvq->vq, "Fail to batch sending packets\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> +signal_used:
>> + vhost_net_signal_used(nvq);
>> + nvq->batched_xdp = 0;
>> +}
>> +
> Given it's all tun-specific now, how about just exporting tap_sendmsg
> and calling that? Will get rid of some indirection too.
>
Yes we can do it on top in the future.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists