[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180914144518.GB29898@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:45:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] x86/mm: add .bss..decrypted section to hold
shared variables
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:27:09AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The above code will never get executed for the SEV case.
>
> See if (!sme_active()) check in the start of function.
>
> If we decide to go on this patch, then we have to do something like
> this:
>
> sme_encrypt_kernel(...)
> {
> if (!mem_encrypt_active())
> return;
>
> if (sev_active())
> goto out;
>
> /* Do kernel and initrd in-place encrypts for SME only case */
> .....
> .....
>
> out:
> /* Clear the C-bit from .bss..decrypted section */
> ...
> ...
Or above do:
if (sev_active()) {
sev_map_bss_decrypted();
return;
}
which is a separate function you call.
So that you not have a label at the end of the function. Whatever tglx
prefers.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists