lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:56:49 +0100
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Nathan March <nathan@...net>,
        Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        syzbot+3aa9784721dfb90e984d@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [tty]  f26eb68a52: INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds

On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 17:01 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-4.9):

Thanks,

[..]
> [  245.080051] INFO: task lkp-setup-rootf:500 blocked for more than
> 120 seconds.
> [  245.082850]       Tainted: G        W       T 4.19.0-rc3-00014-
> gf26eb68 #1
> [  245.084673] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> disables this message.
> [  245.086455] lkp-setup-rootf D 6516   500    498 0x00000000
> [  245.087766] Call Trace:
> [  245.088391]  __schedule+0x4b1/0xe80
> [  245.089322]  schedule+0x25/0x60
> [  245.090178]  schedule_timeout+0x275/0x4e0
> [  245.091105]  ? __ldsem_down_write_nested+0x1aa/0x300
> [  245.092217]  __ldsem_down_write_nested+0x1b2/0x300
> [  245.093286]  ? ldsem_down_write+0x2a/0x2e
> [  245.094305]  ldsem_down_write+0x2a/0x2e
> [  245.095211]  tty_ldisc_lock+0x16/0x40
> [  245.096104]  tty_reopen+0x3f/0xc0
> [  245.096892]  tty_open+0x3cf/0x450
> [  245.097718]  chrdev_open+0x9c/0x1f0
> [  245.098511]  ? security_file_open+0x99/0xa0
> [  245.099512]  do_dentry_open+0x3d5/0x5d0
> [  245.100428]  ? inode_permission+0x95/0x180
> [  245.101351]  ? cdev_put+0x30/0x30
> [  245.102138]  vfs_open+0x2d/0x30
> [  245.102898]  path_openat+0x9e1/0x17d0
> [  245.103733]  do_filp_open+0x6a/0x120
> [  245.104541]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
> [  245.105439]  ? __alloc_fd+0xa5/0x170
> [  245.106309]  do_sys_open+0x13a/0x250
> [  245.107118]  sys_open+0x22/0x30
> [  245.107980]  do_int80_syscall_32+0x94/0x1c0
> [  245.108982]  entry_INT80_32+0xf3/0xf3

So, unfortunately, I'll still have to set timeout to 5 sec for
tty_reopen(). The better fix would be to release read lock whenever a
writer is pending (say n_tty_receive_buf_common() can fallback), but
that's probably better to put in another patches set, as this one is
already packed.
Annoyingly, it means that open(tty) will have now more chances to fail
then before.. But still it's better than a panic with null-ptr deref.

-- 
Thanks,
             Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ