[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180914162828.5e75ffh5sig4om3d@qschulz>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:28:28 +0200
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
antoine.tenart@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: mscc: add support for VSC8584 PHY
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:29:30PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Most of the init sequence of a PHY of the package is common to all PHYs
> > > in the package, thus we use the SMI broadcast feature which enables us
> > > to propagate a write in one register of one PHY to all PHYs in the
> > > package.
> >
> > Hi Quinten
> >
> > Could you say a bit more about the broadcast. Does the SMI broadcast
> > go to all PHY everywhere on an MDIO bus, or only all PHYs within one
> > package? I'm just thinking about the case you need two of these
> > packages to cover 8 switch ports.
> >
>
> Ah sorry, that wasn't very explicit. That's a feature on the PHY side so
> my wildest guess is that it wouldn't impact any other PHY outside of
> this package. Affecting any other PHY on the bus is counter-intuitive to
> me but I'll ask the HW engineers for confirmation.
>
Confirmed by HW engineers, it only impacts PHYs in the same package.
Quentin
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists