linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:19:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
cc:     Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
        <parri.andrea@...il.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        <npiggin@...il.com>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes

On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> 	bf36a3124d04 doc: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire()
> 
> 		Small change, needs an ack.  Looks to me like is is
> 		just aligning the documentation with the code, so
> 		should not be controversial (famous last words).
> 
> 		Please take a look and consider giving feedback
> 		and/or a review/ack.

What branch is this commit in?  It doesn't seem to be in the lkmm 
branch.

In any case, the change is trivial and obviously correct.

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>

Alan