[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180916114011.GA5040@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 14:40:11 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Serge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@...el.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 09/13] x86/sgx: Enclave Page Cache (EPC) memory
manager
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:04:39AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > +static void sgx_reclaim_pages(void)
> > +{
> > + struct sgx_epc_page *chunk[SGX_NR_TO_SCAN + 1];
>
> The array size should simply be SGX_NR_TO_SCAN. The +1 is a remnant
> from the previous version that bounded the for-loops with "!chunk[i]"
> check instead of "i < j". No functional issue, essentially just an
> unused variable.
Thanks, yep, it is cruft.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists