lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <037b4cf8-5dfa-d554-b126-a2462ba9c803@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:16:59 -0700
From:   Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Acknowledge most interrupts early in
 interrupt handler

On 9/17/2018 9:34 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> Looks good to me. Thanks! :)
>>
>> Acked-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Does that mean I need to revert "[PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle
> master/slave combined irq events properly" in i2c/for-next? And apply
> this to i2c/for-current?
> 
> (and please quote only relevat parts of a message when replying)
> 

No need to revert "[PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave
combined irq events properly". This patch should be applied on top of
the patch.

(Will reduce message size when replying. Thanks!)

Jae

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ