linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI/PPTT: Handle architecturally unknown cache types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a40d4e5-8b5b-dc6c-17e3-d6f02e396b2d@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:46:27 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        jeremy.linton@....com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkilari@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI/PPTT: Handle architecturally unknown cache
 types

On 9/17/2018 10:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/09/18 17:28, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> The type of a cache might not be specified by architectural mechanisms (ie
>> system registers), but its type might be specified in the PPTT.  In this
>> case, we should populate the type of the cache, rather than leave it
>> undefined.
>>
>> This fixes the issue where the cacheinfo driver will not populate sysfs
>> for such caches, resulting in the information missing from utilities like
>> lstopo and lscpu, thus degrading the user experience.
>>
>> Fixes: 2bd00bcd73e5 (ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology Table parsing)
>> Reported-by: Vijaya Kumar K <vkilari@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
>> index d1e26cb..bb00ed9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
>> @@ -402,11 +402,18 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   	/*
>> -	 * If the above flags are valid, and the cache type is NOCACHE
>> -	 * update the cache type as well.
>> +	 * If cache type is NOCACHE, then the cache hasn't been specified
>> +	 * via other mechanisms.  Update the type if either the cache has
>> +	 * been fully specified in PPTT, or a cache type has been provided.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Note, we assume such caches are unified based on conventional system
>> +	 * design and known examples.  Significant work is required elsewhere to
>> +	 * fully support data/instruction only type caches which are only
>> +	 * specified in PPTT.
>>   	 */
>> -	if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE &&
>> -	    valid_flags == PPTT_CHECKED_ATTRIBUTES)
>> +	if ((this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE) &&
>> +	    (valid_flags == PPTT_CHECKED_ATTRIBUTES ||
>> +	     found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_VALID))
>>   		this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
> 
> I thought I did mention that we can drop the valid_flags altogether
> unless Jeremy has reasons not to.
> 

You suggested that perhaps that could be the case.  It seemed like an 
open question to me.  I'm at Linaro Connect without access to the device 
this week, so I guess someone has roughly a week to chime in that the 
valid flags should be kept, otherwise I'll try a v3 with them removed.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.