[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180917211717.807106122@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:42:55 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 145/158] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Fix allocation in atomic context
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
[ Upstream commit 46583e8c48c5a094ba28060615b3a7c8c576690f ]
When attaching a device to an IOMMU group with
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:421
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 61, name: kworker/1:1
...
Call trace:
...
arm_lpae_alloc_pgtable+0x114/0x184
arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1+0x2c/0x128
arm_32_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1+0x40/0x6c
alloc_io_pgtable_ops+0x60/0x88
ipmmu_attach_device+0x140/0x334
ipmmu_attach_device() takes a spinlock, while arm_lpae_alloc_pgtable()
allocates memory using GFP_KERNEL. Originally, the ipmmu-vmsa driver
had its own custom page table allocation implementation using
GFP_ATOMIC, hence the spinlock was fine.
Fix this by replacing the spinlock by a mutex, like the arm-smmu driver
does.
Fixes: f20ed39f53145e45 ("iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Use the ARM LPAE page table allocator")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain {
struct io_pgtable_ops *iop;
unsigned int context_id;
- spinlock_t lock; /* Protects mappings */
+ struct mutex mutex; /* Protects mappings */
};
static struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *to_vmsa_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static struct iommu_domain *__ipmmu_doma
if (!domain)
return NULL;
- spin_lock_init(&domain->lock);
+ mutex_init(&domain->mutex);
return &domain->io_domain;
}
@@ -641,7 +641,6 @@ static int ipmmu_attach_device(struct io
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = to_ipmmu(dev);
struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *domain = to_vmsa_domain(io_domain);
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned int i;
int ret = 0;
@@ -650,7 +649,7 @@ static int ipmmu_attach_device(struct io
return -ENXIO;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&domain->mutex);
if (!domain->mmu) {
/* The domain hasn't been used yet, initialize it. */
@@ -674,7 +673,7 @@ static int ipmmu_attach_device(struct io
} else
dev_info(dev, "Reusing IPMMU context %u\n", domain->context_id);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&domain->mutex);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists