linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] rdma: move the ib_wr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EA913ED399BBA34AA4EAC2EDC24CDD009C1DDDA7@fmsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:14:33 +0000
From:   "Howell, Seth" <seth.howell@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC:     "Walker, Benjamin" <benjamin.walker@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rdma: move the ib_wr_opcode enum to include/uapi

Thank you Jason!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgg@...pe.ca] 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:08 PM
To: Howell, Seth <seth.howell@...el.com>
Cc: Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker@...el.com>; Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma: move the ib_wr_opcode enum to include/uapi

> >From e3c1b1b81373601fa6cbad2ba5fadd2c8cfdfaed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 
> >2001
> From: Seth Howell <seth.howell@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:33:02 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] IB/rxe: Revise the ib_wr_opcode enum
> 
> This enum has become part of the uABI, as both RXE and the
> ib_uverbs_post_send() command expect userspace to supply values from 
> this enum. So it should be properly placed in include/uapi/rdma.
> 
> In userspace this enum is called 'enum ibv_wr_opcode' as part of 
> libibverbs.h. That enum defines different values for IB_WR_LOCAL_INV, 
> IB_WR_SEND_WITH_INV, and IB_WR_LSO. These were introduced 
> (incorrectly, it turns out) into libiberbs in 2015.
> 
> The kernel has changed its mind on the numbering for several of the 
> IB_WC values over the years, but has remained stable on 
> IB_WR_LOCAL_INV and below.
> 
> Based on this we can conclude that there is no real user space user of 
> the values beyond IB_WR_ATOMIC_FETCH_AND_ADD, as they have never 
> worked via rdma-core. This is confirmed by inspection, only rxe uses 
> the kernel enum and implements the latter operations. rxe has clearly 
> never worked with these attributes from userspace. Other drivers that 
> support these opcodes implement the functionality without calling out 
> to the kernel.
> 
> To make IB_WR_SEND_WITH_INV and related work for RXE in userspace we 
> choose to renumber the IB_WR enum in the kernel to match the uABI that 
> userspace has bee using since before Soft RoCE was merged. This is an 
> overall simpler configuration for the whole software stack, and 
> obviously can't break anything existing.
> 
> Reported-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@...el.com>
> Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
>  include/rdma/ib_verbs.h           | 34 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Applied to for-next

Thanks,
Jason