lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABe79T41+-JE=0m1L2dYcP1-izKxN_H7NAdSjwB52ym8we4_dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 09:20:15 +0530
From:   Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>,
        Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] thermal: broadcom: Add Stingray thermal driver

Hi Daniel,

Thank you for your review comments.
I will address all your comments in next patch set.

Regards,
Srinath.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 09/08/2018 14:54, Srinath Mannam wrote:
>> From: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>
>>
>> Adds stingray thermal driver to monitor six
>> thermal zones temperature and trips at critical temperature.
>
> Hi Pramod,
>
> could you elaborate a bit more the description? As you are introducing a
> new driver it would be nice to give the sensor details.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@...adcom.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig               |   3 +-
>>  drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig      |   9 ++
>>  drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile     |   1 +
>>  drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c | 216 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
>> index 8297988..26d39d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
>> @@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ config MTK_THERMAL
>>         controller present in Mediatek SoCs
>>
>>  menu "Broadcom thermal drivers"
>> -depends on ARCH_BCM || ARCH_BRCMSTB || ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST
>> +depends on ARCH_BCM || ARCH_BRCMSTB || ARCH_BCM2835 || ARCH_BCM_IPROC || \
>> +             COMPILE_TEST
>>  source "drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig"
>>  endmenu
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
>> index c106a15..dc9a9bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
>> @@ -22,3 +22,12 @@ config BCM_NS_THERMAL
>>         BCM4708, BCM4709, BCM5301x, BCM95852X, etc). It contains DMU (Device
>>         Management Unit) block with a thermal sensor that allows checking CPU
>>         temperature.
>> +
>> +config BCM_SR_THERMAL
>> +     tristate "Stingray thermal driver"
>> +     depends on ARCH_BCM_IPROC || COMPILE_TEST
>> +     default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>> +     help
>> +       Support for the Stingray family of SoCs. Its different blocks like
>> +       iHost, CRMU and NITRO has thermal sensor that allows checking its
>> +       temperature.
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile
>> index fae10ec..79df69e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Makefile
>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_THERMAL)                += bcm2835_thermal.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_BRCMSTB_THERMAL)                += brcmstb_thermal.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_NS_THERMAL)         += ns-thermal.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_SR_THERMAL)         += sr-thermal.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..909f80c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/sr-thermal.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Broadcom
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
>> +
>> +#define TMON_CRIT_TEMP          105000 /* temp in millidegree C */
>
> I suggest to move this in the DT?
>
>> +#define SR_TMON_MAX_LIST        6
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In stingray thermal IO memory,
>> + * Total Number of available TMONs MASK is at offset 0
>> + * temperature registers BASE is at 4 byte offset.
>> + * Each TMON temperature register size is 4.
>> + */
>> +#define SR_TMON_TEMP_BASE(id)   ((id) * 0x4)
>> +
>> +static const char * const sr_tmon_names[SR_TMON_MAX_LIST] = {
>
> It will be more elegant to replace the macro SR_TMON_MAX_LIST by
> ARRAY_SIZE(sr_tmon_names) and declare this array as:
>
> static const char *const sr_tmon_name[] = {
>         ...
> };
>
>> +     "sr_tmon_ihost0",
>> +     "sr_tmon_ihost1",
>> +     "sr_tmon_ihost2",
>> +     "sr_tmon_ihost3",
>> +     "sr_tmon_crmu",
>> +     "sr_tmon_nitro",
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct sr_tmon {
>> +     struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>> +     unsigned int crit_temp;
>> +     unsigned int tmon_id;
>> +     struct sr_thermal *priv;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct sr_thermal {
>> +     struct device *dev;
>
> This field is used for dev_dbg, may be it could be removed along with
> the dev_dbg message?
>
>> +     void __iomem *regs;
>> +     struct sr_tmon tmon[SR_TMON_MAX_LIST];
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int sr_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>> +{
>> +     struct sr_tmon *tmon = tz->devdata;
>> +     struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal = tmon->priv;
>> +
>> +     *temp = readl(sr_thermal->regs + SR_TMON_TEMP_BASE(tmon->tmon_id));
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sr_get_trip_type(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip,
>> +                                     enum thermal_trip_type *type)
>> +{
>> +     struct sr_tmon *tmon = tz->devdata;
>> +     struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal = tmon->priv;
>> +
>> +     switch (trip) {
>> +     case 0:
>> +             *type = THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL;
>> +             break;
>> +     default:
>> +             dev_dbg(sr_thermal->dev,
>> +                     "Driver does not support more than 1 trip point\n");
>> +             return -EINVAL;
>> +     }
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sr_get_trip_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip, int *temp)
>> +{
>> +     struct sr_tmon *tmon = tz->devdata;
>> +     struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal = tmon->priv;
>> +
>> +     switch (trip) {
>> +     case 0:
>> +             *temp = tmon->crit_temp;
>> +             break;
>> +     default:
>> +             dev_dbg(sr_thermal->dev,
>> +                     "Driver does not support more than 1 trip point\n");
>> +             return -EINVAL;
>> +     }
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sr_set_trip_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip, int temp)
>> +{
>> +     struct sr_tmon *tmon = tz->devdata;
>> +
>> +     switch (trip) {
>> +     case 0:
>> +             /*
>> +              * Allow the user to change critical temperature
>> +              * as per their requirement, could be for debug
>> +              * purpose, even if it's more than the recommended
>> +              * critical temperature.
>> +              */
>
> Couldn't the user harm the hardware with a too high value?
>
> Why not define this value in the DT?
>
>> +             tmon->crit_temp = temp;
>> +             break;
>> +     default:
>> +             return -EINVAL;
>> +     }
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>
> Is it possible to factor out these 3 functions above and remove the
> 'switch' in all of them ?
>
>> +static struct thermal_zone_device_ops sr_thermal_ops = {
>> +     .get_temp = sr_get_temp,
>> +     .get_trip_type = sr_get_trip_type,
>> +     .get_trip_temp = sr_get_trip_temp,
>> +     .set_trip_temp = sr_set_trip_temp,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int sr_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +     struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal;
>> +     struct sr_tmon *tmon;
>> +     struct resource *res;
>> +     uint32_t sr_tmon_list = 0;
>> +     unsigned int i;
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     sr_thermal = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sr_thermal), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     if (!sr_thermal)
>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +     sr_thermal->dev = dev;
>> +
>> +     res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +     sr_thermal->regs = (void __iomem *)devm_memremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
>> +                                      resource_size(res), MEMREMAP_WB);
>> +     if (IS_ERR(sr_thermal->regs)) {
>> +             dev_err(dev, "failed to get io address\n");
>> +             return PTR_ERR(sr_thermal->regs);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "brcm,tmon-mask", &sr_tmon_list);
>> +     if (ret)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>> +     for (i = 0; i < SR_TMON_MAX_LIST; i++) {
>> +
>> +             if (!(sr_tmon_list & BIT(i)))
>> +                     continue;
>> +
>> +             /* Flush temperature registers */
>> +             writel(0, sr_thermal->regs + SR_TMON_TEMP_BASE(i));
>> +             tmon = &sr_thermal->tmon[i];
>
> It is possible to initialize tmon to:
>
>                 tmon = &sr_thermal->tmon;
>
> and then use the pointer increment:
>                 tmon++;
>
>
>> +             tmon->crit_temp = TMON_CRIT_TEMP;
>> +             tmon->tmon_id = i;
>> +             tmon->priv = sr_thermal;
>> +             tmon->tz = thermal_zone_device_register(sr_tmon_names[i],
>> +                             1, 1,
>> +                             tmon,
>> +                             &sr_thermal_ops,
>> +                             NULL, 1000, 1000);
>> +             if (IS_ERR(tmon->tz))
>> +                     goto err_exit;
>> +
>> +             dev_info(dev, "%s: registered\n", sr_tmon_names[i]);
>> +     }
>> +     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sr_thermal);
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +
>> +err_exit:
>> +     while (--i >= 0) {
>> +             if (sr_thermal->tmon[i].tz)
>> +                     thermal_zone_device_unregister(sr_thermal->tmon[i].tz);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return PTR_ERR(tmon->tz);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sr_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +     struct sr_thermal *sr_thermal = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +     unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +     for (i = 0; i < SR_TMON_MAX_LIST; i++)
>> +             if (sr_thermal->tmon[i].tz)
>> +                     thermal_zone_device_unregister(sr_thermal->tmon[i].tz);
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sr_thermal_of_match[] = {
>> +     { .compatible = "brcm,sr-thermal", },
>> +     {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sr_thermal_of_match);
>> +
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id sr_thermal_acpi_ids[] = {
>> +     { .id = "BRCM0500" },
>> +     { /* sentinel */ }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sr_thermal_acpi_ids);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver sr_thermal_driver = {
>> +     .probe          = sr_thermal_probe,
>> +     .remove         = sr_thermal_remove,
>> +     .driver = {
>> +             .name = "sr-thermal",
>> +             .of_match_table = sr_thermal_of_match,
>> +             .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(sr_thermal_acpi_ids),
>> +     },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(sr_thermal_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Stingray thermal driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>
>
> --
>  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ