[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e371a365-7dac-8e20-4823-f5395602211d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:46:17 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] mfd: ezx-pcap: Possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in
pcap_adc_irq()
On 2018/9/17 9:03, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2018, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>> The driver may sleep in an interrupt handler.
>> The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.17 are:
>>
>> [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 272:
>> mutex_lock_nested in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler)
>>
>> [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 100:
>> mutex_lock_nested in ezx_pcap_read
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 281:
>> ezx_pcap_read in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler)
>>
>> [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 85:
>> mutex_lock_nested in ezx_pcap_write
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 285:
>> ezx_pcap_write in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler)
>>
>> [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 244:
>> mutex_lock_nested in pcap_adc_trigger
>> drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 299:
>> pcap_adc_trigger in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler)
>>
>> These bugs are found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
> Not sure what you want me to do with this.
>
> Do you have something in mind?
>
I find some possible bugs in this driver, but I do not know how to
correctly fix them...
Could you find a good solution?
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists