[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71ab1337-3681-ecdc-4eb8-57ad5656db27@katsuster.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:12:18 +0900
From: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add i2s and spdif endpoints of
rk3328
Hello Heiko,
On 2018年09月17日 19:47, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, 17. September 2018, 10:55:55 CEST schrieb Katsuhiro Suzuki:
>> This patch adds port and endpoint of i2s and spdif nodes for rk3328.
>> Because to use modern sound card interface such as audio-graph-card.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
>> index d3ef6566325e..fd35dbd37ee2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
>> @@ -179,7 +179,13 @@
>> clock-names = "i2s_clk", "i2s_hclk";
>> dmas = <&dmac 11>, <&dmac 12>;
>> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + i2s0_p0: port {
>> + i2s0_p0_0: endpoint {
>> + };
>> + };
>
> I'm still pondering this. I.e. I'm not sure I really like adding all these
> empty nodes only to have them filled in board devicetrees.
>
> This is specific to the audio-graph-card, and neither simple-audio-card
> nor the Rockchip-specific cards we have use something like this, so
> currently I'm tending to just have all audio-graph-nodes defined in the
> board devicetree using it.
>
> For example similar to arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts
> or zte/zx296718-pcbox.dts do it.
>
> It would be different if the graph-links were actually on the soc-level
> like vop<->hdmi or so, but this is completely board-specific.
>
> Same for the others below.
>
> Thoughts?
> Heiko
Hmm, OK. These nodes will move into the device tree of ROCK64.
Thank you for your advise!
Regards,
--
Katsuhiro Suzuki
>
>
>> };
>>
>> i2s1: i2s@...10000 {
>> @@ -190,7 +196,13 @@
>> clock-names = "i2s_clk", "i2s_hclk";
>> dmas = <&dmac 14>, <&dmac 15>;
>> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + i2s1_p0: port {
>> + i2s1_p0_0: endpoint {
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> i2s2: i2s@...20000 {
>> @@ -201,7 +213,13 @@
>> clock-names = "i2s_clk", "i2s_hclk";
>> dmas = <&dmac 0>, <&dmac 1>;
>> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + i2s2_p0: port {
>> + i2s2_p0_0: endpoint {
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> spdif: spdif@...30000 {
>> @@ -214,7 +232,13 @@
>> dma-names = "tx";
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> pinctrl-0 = <&spdifm2_tx>;
>> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + spdif_p0: port {
>> + spdif_p0_0: endpoint {
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> pdm: pdm@...40000 {
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists