[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180917112149.GE7239@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:21:49 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom-apq8064: use correct pci address for
address translation
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:01:34PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> For PCI, the second and third cell in ranges specifies the upper and
> lower target address for address translation. This target address will
> be used to program the internal address translation unit (iATU).
>
> The current device tree configuration will program the iATU to translate
> CPU accesses to 0x08000000 to PCI address 0x0 (with TLP type MEM).
> The device tree configuration also specifies that CPU acesses to
> 0x0fe00000 will be translated to PCI address 0x0 (with TLP type I/O).
>
> We cannot have both I/O space and memory space at PCI address 0x0.
>
> The PCI code already uses the CPU address when assigning addresses to
> memory BARs, so for memory space the PCI address should be the same as
> the CPU address. This also matches how all other device trees using
> snps,dw-pcie are configured.
>
> The existing configuration appears to work, even if it is incorrect.
> For some reason the iATU doesn't obey the existing configuration,
> and doesn't translate CPU accesses from 0x08000000 to PCI address 0x0.
>
> The reason why the existing configuration works at all is probably
> because the default behavior, when there is no match, is to use the
> untranslated address. This happens to work for memory space, since
> it's a 1:1 mapping. However, instead of relying on this behavior,
> let's configure the iATU correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Niklas,
what's this patch status ? Please let me know if I have to keep
it in the PCI tree queue, I think, if ACKed, it should probably
go via the arm-soc tree.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index 5341a39c0392..148cf7e565f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@
> #address-cells = <3>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
> ranges = <0x81000000 0 0 0x0fe00000 0 0x00100000 /* I/O */
> - 0x82000000 0 0 0x08000000 0 0x07e00000>; /* memory */
> + 0x82000000 0 0x08000000 0x08000000 0 0x07e00000>; /* memory */
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 238 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> interrupt-names = "msi";
> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> --
> 2.17.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists