linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pat: Fix L1TF stable backport for CPA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0263c7cf-dafb-012a-78af-9b9f8e4a57fe@suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:16:33 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bernhard.kaindl@...lesgroup.com,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pat: Fix L1TF stable backport for CPA

On 09/17/2018, 01:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:27:49PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> And what about populate_pud?
>>>                 set_pud(pud, pud_mkhuge(pfn_pud(cpa->pfn,
>>>                                    canon_pgprot(pud_pgprot))));
>>>
>>>                 start     += PUD_SIZE;
>>>                 cpa->pfn  += PUD_SIZE;
>>
>> Yes you're right. That case needs to be fixed too.
>>
>> Are you sending a patch, or should I?
> 
> Someone needs to.  Please?

You already released 4.4.x with the patch :):

commit 15898df477269c981dc1ae5afa39e1bb65e1db0a
Author: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Date:   Fri Sep 7 11:13:07 2018 +0200

    x86/mm/pat: Fix L1TF stable backport for CPA, 2nd call

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs