linux-kernel - Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180917122430.GA3320@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:24:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...m.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Seriously though, I read this to know what I need to be aware of but oddly
> the language of this paragraph says it doesn't apply to me:  I'm not using
> an official project e-mail address nor an official social media account,
> nor has anyone appointed me as representative.  I can live with that, I'm
> just wondering what the benefit of a document is that only seems to apply
> to a tiny fraction of the community.

I do not think you are reading the document correctly.  As an example,
it should cover any emails sent to this list.  That is not a "tiny
fraction" by my last count :)

thanks,

greg k-h