[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180917141018.GB28689@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:10:18 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Show CPU ID and Hart ID separately in
/proc/cpuinfo
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> The extra hart information will not be parsed by lscpu which will make the
> cpu information inconsistent between lscpu & /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Should we patch lscpu as well to show correct hart id as well ?
It would be good to follow whatever prescedent other architectures
with different logical vs physical cpuids have set.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists