linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180917142017.GA15588@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:20:17 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc:     palmer@...ive.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        hch@...radead.org, mark.rutland@....com, robh@...nel.org,
        Damien.LeMoal@....com, marc.zyngier@....com, anup@...infault.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 02:54:54PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
> 
> Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly,
> because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place.  This
> corrects the issue, moving it from

Last time this was brought up we actually had realy life DTs with
the timebase-frequency under cpus and not the invidual cpu node.

I think we need to just document both possibilities and live with
them.