[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180917150941.GH7239@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:09:41 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] PCI: imx: Initial imx7d suspend/resume support
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 07:50:14PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> On imx7d the pcie-phy power domain is turned off in suspend and this can
> make the system hang on resume when attempting any read from PCI.
>
> Fix this by adding PM_SLEEP support to the imx6 pci driver. This is
> currently only enabled for imx7d but the suspend/resume sequence also
> applies to other socs.
>
> V3 of this series was reviewed by Lucas but stalled because the merge
> window opened.
>
> There was also some confusion about how to deal with the dependence on
> commit 26fce0557fa6 ("reset: imx7: Fix always writing bits as 0"). To
> clarify: both patch 2 and 26fce0557fa6 are required to fix imx7d suspend
> but merging one without the other shouldn't cause other issues.
>
>
> V4 adds 4 more patches with PME_Turn_Off support on top, using a new
> reset bit. I generally try to keep series short but in this case some
> planning might be needed to get patches into 4.20.
>
> Since the new reset is treated as optional with old DTB there should be
> again no problem if reset and pci are merged out of order.
>
>
> Shawn/Philipp/Lorenzo: Would it make sense to merge this series through a
> single specific tree, such as the one for imx?
This series is a bit of a mixture of multiple things hard to discern
(actually I already merged patch 2 and patch 1 seems completely
unrelated).
I would take the series through the PCI tree but I need an ACK for
patches 5 and 6, please let me know how you want to handle it.
Lorenzo
> Link to v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/24/713
>
> Leonard Crestez (6):
> Revert "ARM: dts: imx7d: Invert legacy PCI irq mapping"
> PCI: imx: Initial imx7d pm support
> reset: imx7: Add PCIE_CTRL_APPS_TURNOFF
> dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add turnoff reset for imx7d
> ARM: dts: imx7d: Add turnoff reset
> PCI: imx: Add PME_Turn_Off support
>
> .../bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi | 17 ++-
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c | 1 +
> include/dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h | 4 +-
> 5 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists