[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALxhOngq7kjFTA=oQBzV5fEtdtCq6ytb8excP76Gshikq3Q-4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:15:18 +0530
From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sparc: Replace NR_SYSCALLS macro with __NR_SYSCALLS
On 6 September 2018 at 20:59, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:42 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> -#define NR_syscalls 361
>> +#define __NR_syscalls 361
>
> What about the suggestion that was made earlier to enclose this in
> #ifdef __KERNEL__?
The issue, keeping __NR_syscalls in uapi header was pointed out by
Michal Simek (microblaze) and Geert Uytterhoeven (m68k). I replied
them with this suggestion (enclose with #ifdef __KERNEL__). Once
they agree, my next version of patch series will have this change.
- Firoz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists