[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180918125021.GB902964@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:50:21 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] lib/percpu-refcount: introduce percpu_ref_resurge()
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 06:19:44PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Now percpu_ref_reinit() can only be done on one percpu refcounter when it
> drops zero. And the limit shouldn't be so strict, and it is quite
> straightforward that we can do it when the refcount doesn't drop zero
> because it is at atomic mode.
>
> This patch introduces percpu_ref_resurge() in which the above limit is
> relaxed, so we may avoid extra change[1] for NVMe timeout's requirement.
For now,
Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Please see the original discussion thread.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists