linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firewire: nosy: don't read packets bigger than requested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:02:05 +0200
From:   Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: nosy: don't read packets bigger than
 requested

On Sep 03 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/03/2018 08:55 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:  
> >> In general, accessing userspace memory beyond the length of the supplied
> >> buffer in VFS read/write handlers can lead to both kernel memory corruption
> >> (via kernel_read()/kernel_write(), which can e.g. be triggered via
> >> sys_splice()) and privilege escalation inside userspace.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 286468210d83 ("firewire: new driver: nosy - IEEE 1394 traffic sniffer")
> >> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
[...]
> >>  drivers/firewire/nosy.c | 5 +++--
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[...]
> > Ping. I sent this about two months ago, I haven't received a reply,
> > and from what I can tell, it hasn't landed in any tree so far...
> >   
> 
> :(
> I have that same problem with some Firewire documentation patches.
> I plan to ask someone else to merge my patches.

Jann,

sorry for not responding in July (was buried in other work and been
effectively absent from maintainership for many months).  And sorry for
missing your ping in September (it must have been misplaced into the spam
folder and I apparently overlooked it there).

This week is another one in which I will not be able to check your patch.
Next week I will have a vacation of sorts and will use it to (a) review
and merge your patch and (b) clean out my mailbox and update my mail
sorting filters (long overdue after my mail service provider changed
backends).

Again sorry, and thank you for your extraordinary patience.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-======---=- =--= =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/