linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 18/18] kvm: arm64: Allow tuning the physical address size for VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <218b64d5-741d-97ef-8aae-bc0a2ac3e56c@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:16:27 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Cc:     arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Christoffer Dall <cdall@...nel.org>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Dave P Martin <dave.martin@....com>, julien.grall@....com,
        lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/18] kvm: arm64: Allow tuning the physical address
 size for VM

Hi Peter,

On 18/09/2018 02:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 September 2018 at 11:41, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com> wrote:
>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>> @@ -122,6 +122,14 @@ the default trap & emulate implementation (which changes the virtual
>>   memory layout to fit in user mode), check KVM_CAP_MIPS_VZ and use the
>>   flag KVM_VM_MIPS_VZ.
>>
>> +To configure the physical address space size for a VM (IPA size) on arm64,
>> +check KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_PHYS_SHIFT (which returns the maximum limit for the
>> +IPA shift) and use KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_PHYS_SHIFT(PHYS_SHIFT). Bits[7-0] of the
>> +machine type has been reserved for specifying the PHYS_SHIFT.
>> +The supported range is [32...IPA_LIMIT], where IPA_LIMIT could be
>> +identified by checking KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_PHYS_SHIFT. For backward compatibility
>> +a value of 0 selects 40bits.
>> +
> 
> Given this as the API documentation, I don't think I could figure out
> what I as a userspace user of it need to do without looking at the
> kernel code. Could I ask you to expand it so that it is a bit less
> terse and a bit more detailed? (For instance, what is a PHYS_SHIFT
> and why do I have to specify it rather than just telling the kernel
> I want a 48 bit guest address space?)

Thanks for the feedback.  I acknowledge that the documentation is not
quite clear for a userspace user. How about:

"To configure the physical address space size for a VM (IPA size) on arm64,
check KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE and use KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_IPA_SIZE(IPA_Bits)
as the argument to KVM_CREATE_VM, where IPA_Bits is the maximum width of
any physical address used by the VM. The IPA_Bits is encoded in Bits[7-0]
of the machine type, and must be one of { 0, 32, ... , Host_IPA_Limit },
where :
1) IPA_Bits = 0 implies 40bits IPA (for backward compatibility)
2) Host_IPA_Limit is the maximum limit for IPA_Bits on the host, which is
    dependent on the CPU capability and the host kernel configuration.
    This can be detected by checking the extension KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE
"

note: I have renamed the KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_PHYS_SHIFT => KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE
above and can update the code, if the latter is better.

Suzuki