[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7efec0c76fa692513c806871151a7ae20e99fe05.1537288312.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/20] powerpc/mm: Avoid useless lock with single page
fragments
There is no point in taking the page table lock as
pte_frag is always NULL when we have only one fragment.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
index bc924822dcd6..ab4910e92aaf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ static pte_t *get_pte_from_cache(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
void *pte_frag, *ret;
+ if (PTE_FRAG_NR == 1)
+ return NULL;
+
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
ret = mm->context.pte_frag;
if (ret) {
--
2.13.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists