linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: GENI SE SPI controller device tree binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VJesdkPuHmg8qSfkM284aC36Gq9OdbeJFTtpwGqtuEmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:11:13 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Dilip Kota <dkota@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: GENI SE SPI controller
 device tree binding

Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:08 AM Dilip Kota <dkota@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Move GENI SE SPI controller device-tree bindings
> from devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.txt
> to devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-geni-qcom.txt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota <dkota@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.txt  | 27 ++-------------
>  .../devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-geni-qcom.txt | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

IMO this matches what Mark Brown requested in a previous email and
seems like a good idea.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>