[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809182214380.1468@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:15:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 01/20] signal: Simplify
tracehook_report_syscall_exit
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Replace user_single_step_siginfo with user_single_step_report
> that allocates siginfo structure on the stack and sends it.
>
> This allows tracehook_report_syscall_exit to become a simple
> if statement that calls user_single_step_report or ptrace_report_syscall
> depending on the value of step.
>
> Update the default helper function now called user_single_step_report
> to explicitly set si_code to SI_USER and to set si_uid and si_pid to 0.
> The default helper has always been doing this (using memset) but it
> was far from obvious.
>
> The powerpc helper can now just call force_sig_fault.
> The x86 helper can now just call send_sigtrap.
>
> Unfortunately the default implementation of user_single_step_report
> can not use force_sig_fault as it does not use a SIGTRAP si_code.
> So it has to carefully setup the siginfo and use use force_sig_info.
>
> The net result is code that is easier to understand and simpler
> to maintain.
>
> Ref: 85ec7fd9f8e5 ("ptrace: introduce user_single_step_siginfo() helper")
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists