linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio: davinci: Use dev name for label and automatic base selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:38:08 +0530
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
CC:     "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio: davinci: Use dev name for label and automatic
 base selection



On Wednesday 19 September 2018 12:56 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:13 PM Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com> wrote:
> 
>> Use dev_name to get a unique label and use -1 for a base to get our
>> selection automatically. We pull in all GPIOs per chip now so this
>> does not have the effect of out of order labels like before.
>>
>> We do these both together so we can drop all the static data in one
>> patch. This also lets us normalize the return paths as we don't need
>> any cleanup after this change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com>
> 
> I have tentatively applied this patch set as we seem to have rough
> consensus that it will be OK.
> 
> We can always pull it out or revert it if things break.

Okay. If that is the case then i have already tested the entire series.

Apart from gpio numbering different, i have tested toggling and
interrupts with k2g-evm and omapl138.

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>