[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQrOhJpkUf=zxvwcbf8oWTAhKiWxemweHz8QPT55H+R-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:58:40 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples: disable CONFIG_SAMPLES for UML
Hi.
2018-09-18 17:21 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>:
> Am Dienstag, 18. September 2018, 05:58:33 CEST schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
>> Some samples require headers installation, so commit 3fca1700c4c3
>> ("kbuild: make samples really depend on headers_install") added
>> such dependency in the top Makefile. However, UML fails to build
>> with CONFIG_SAMPLES=y because UML does not support headers_install.
>>
>> Fixes: 3fca1700c4c3 ("kbuild: make samples really depend on headers_install")
>> Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>
> Is there anything UML can do better?
> Not sure whether an arch like is supposed to install headers at all,
> I guess no. :)
I just thought suppressing CONFIG_SAMPLES was a big hammer.
We could install host-arch headers for UML if we like,
but I am not sure whether is is sensible...
Wait for comments in case somebody has a better solution.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists