linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add pinctrl node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TY1PR01MB1769B445E15C05F342ABCCACF51C0@TY1PR01MB1769.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:27:43 +0000
From:   Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add pinctrl node

Hi Geert,

On 19 September 2018 10:24 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:18 AM Phil Edworthy  wrote:
> > On 19 September 2018 10:15 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:36:09PM +0100, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > > This provides a pinctrl driver for the Renesas R9A06G032 SoC
> > > >
> > > > Based on a patch originally written by Michel Pollet at Renesas.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks Phil, I will defer this patch pending acceptance of the bindings.
> > > Please continue to repost this patch with updates to the bindings or
> > > otherwise ping me once they have been accepted.
> > Thanks, however I will send a new version of this patch to remove the
> > clock-names prop as it is not needed.
> 
> I haven't reviewed the bindings patch yet, but it's a good idea to have
> clock-names, even for a single clock.
> It makes life easier if the same module is reused or enhanced in a later SoC,
> with more clock inputs.
Ok, I'll put it back :)

I should be able to get a new version out today so you may want to delay
your review until then.

Thanks
Phil