lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180919012626.GA482@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:26:26 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/33] vfs: Implement a filesystem superblock
 creation/configuration context [ver #11]

On (09/19/18 10:12), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/18/18 07:06), Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > So the check either better be
> > > 
> > > 	if (fc->ops && fc->ops->reconfigure)
> > > 
> > 
> > Since there are multiple instances of fs_context where fc->ops isn't set,
> > this check would be needed wherever fc->ops is dereferenced.
> 
> Right. If fc is always guaranteed to be properly zeroed-out. This is
> true for kzalloc-ed fc's, but not necessarily so in any other case.

What I mean was something like this

	void foo(void)
	{
		struct fs_context fc;

		fc.purpose   = ...;
		fc.fs_type   = ...;
		fc.root      = ...;
		fc.sb_flags  = ...;

		reconfigure_super(&fc);
	}

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ